Exh liibbcck

The ‘Libertarian communism’ like that of Libcom are a do-nothing variant of ultraleftism which rejects all successful revolutions as being authoritarian or totalitarian etc. 

They specialize in holding past movements up to modern day standards in terms of personal freedoms, for example, writing off all the successes and anti-imperialist internationalism of the Cuba revolution due to the hard truth that gay men weren't allowed to serve in the Cuban military for a bit in the 1960's. They overall aren't down with Vladimir Lenin and they uphold obscure figures who never accomplished stuff, or who died before they could accomplish anything.

Ultraleftists usually believe all the lies about socialist states and groups that were brought forth by the CIA, FBI, etc. They line up with liberal 2.0ers to attack DPRK, Venezuela, China, etc etc 

They further claim that specific movements are or were being of their libcom tendency when in fact they are or were just not like them. For instance, the Kurdish socialists operating in Syria and the Zapatistas in Mexico. 

Libcoms try to act like these two movements are libcom movements except both movements will tell you they are communist or indigenous socialist movements (whether that is the case or not is up for debate, but the point being about libcoms being sucky still stands)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Exh freeorieore

Regressive as in the regressive character of our modern society that is denounced when Western and Eastern ancient texts (in a way mentioned here , here , here , here , here , here , here ) in regards to property, achievements in warfare  jurisprudence-rules and regulations, rituals, a-temporal continuum, crafts-knacks, and pastime contests are extracted giving a clear picture of such regression (along with the regressiveness found after this time honored technique also probes modern society as a whole )
Read more

Exh hyhhj impercvppd

Colonialist discourse   This book talks about postcolonialism and the US intersecting and I echo it "Eric Cheyfitz's essay alerts us to the fact that Buell's analogy between the postcolonial United States and postcolonial Africa, in indigenizing the European immigrants, denies the previous and ongoing existence of indigenous cultures in America. Buell's Emersonian reading of Melville's writings, moreover (he reads Redburn as a mental act of decolonization from the cultural dominance of England), reduces Melville's transnational anti-imperialist vision to a tête-à-tête with the mother country and ignores the text's references to slavery, the middle passage, and Indian dispossession (Buell, "Melville"). And finally, his choice of contemporary African literature in constructing a transhistorical comparison with early America's struggle for cultural independence symptomatically effaces the historical importance of Africa and African people in the
Read more