Exh grghjjjrrr
Because being a 4pt and or having views ‘to the right of Jane Fonda’ in a Liberal 2.0 society is counter cultural , fun, disruptive, challenges social norms and thus its more fun to be counter cultural than being mainstream
Just like the New Left hippies in the 1960s were countercultural in a conservative society, I am a 4pt and or in rare times have views ‘to the right of Jane Fonda’ in a Liberal 2.0 society.
Like in the 1960s kids shocked their parents with long hair, promiscuity, edgy music, I embrace the 4pt and or have views ‘to the right of Jane Fonda’ as a way to shock our Liberal 2.0 overlords
It is way more fun to be a contrarianist than to be mainstream. I love taking the opposite side of some select mainstream Liberal 2.0 political views. Being different is truly liberating.
I am circumstantially contrarian by effect, but not by really by cause.
I am not going against the grain for the hell of it, as though whatever is the popularly (not necessarily majority) accepted, and thus “correct”, take will be eschewed for the absolute opposite as a type of spite or protest.
My central ideology is Marxism that is juxtaposed by the subideologies I highlight and by me avoiding partaking of idpol which makes me appear contrarian only due to the populist understandings on liberalism 2.0 don’t accept it-
I would never earnestly set out to say and do the opposite of anything in Liberal 2.0 discourse just to subvert expectation or rattle cages. I would state that I have earnest issues with the way id is being utilized as a tool by the MSM, social media, state/political party, and by tribal sects
When I critique idpol and reject overkill-buzzfeed ipdol for example, I would seem like a contrarian to every person still stuck at any spot on the IDPOL spectrum. (like like how heroin addicts won’t trust people if they’re in the circle but don’t boot up and jack
I tend to interrogate myself and ask if my priorities are in the correct place and are based off my principle fundamnetal values (as every fellow leftist should).
I always avoid taking political stances which don't align with my values and thus I never legitimately take political stances because the people I declared my mortal political foes (Liberal 2.0) happens to have the opposite political stance. Because to do that would literally mean I don't have real virtues.
The cause (i.e stereotypical) Contrarians (real Contrarians) are annoying as can be. Real Contrarians don't have *any* true beliefs they won't chuck if those beliefs become too popular or they sensed it's better to go after the status quo in another way. Real contrarians are just as flakey as the "Socialists for IDpol!" (trade mark pending), they are merely a different sort of flake. I am not that type of 'Contrarian'
Comments
Post a Comment